What's so special about medicine?
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
- Vol. 14 (1), 27-42
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00993986
Abstract
Health care has increasingly come to be understood as a commodity. The ethical implications of such an understanding are significant. The author argues that health care is not a commodity because health care (1) is non-proprietary, (2) serves the needs of persons who, as patients, are uniquely vulnerable, (3) essentially involves a special human relationship which ought not be bought or sold, (4) helps to define what is meant by ‘necessity’ and cannot be considered a commodity when subjected to rigorous conceptual analysis. The Oslerian conception that medicine is a calling and not a business ought to be reaffirmed by both the profession and the public. Such a conception would have significant ramifications for patient care and health care policy.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medicine as a career: Choices and consequencesTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1989
- The demand for effectiveness, efficiency and equity of health careTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1989
- Professional organization of physicians: Balancing the cost-quality equation. An introductionTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1989
- A Consumer-Choice Health Plan for the 1990sNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Morality for the Medical–Industrial ComplexNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Results and Policy Implications of the Resource-Based Relative-Value StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Debating For-Profit Health Care and the Ethics of PhysiciansHealth Affairs, 1986
- The Function of MedicineThe Hastings Center Report, 1977
- Medicine as a ‘Liberal Art’ and the Question of the Physician's IncomeJournal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 1976