A Comparison of Intranasal Sufentanil and Midazolam to Intramuscular Meperidine, Promethazine, and Chlorpromazine for Conscious Sedation in Children
- 31 October 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 24 (4), 646-651
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70274-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical experience with continuous intravenous sedation using midazolam and fentanyl in the paediatric intensive care unitEuropean Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Rectal thiopental compared with intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric sedationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1991
- Plasma Concentrations of Midazolam in Children Following Intranasal AdministrationAnesthesiology, 1991
- Midazolam nose drops for outpatient echocardiography sedation in infantsAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- The effect of oral midazolam on anxiety of preschool children during laceration repairAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- Intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine: Analysis of use and complications in 487 pediatric emergency department patientsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Preanesthetic Sedation of Preschool Children Using Intranasal MidazolamAnesthesiology, 1988
- Pre-induction of Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients with Nasally Administered SufentanilAnesthesiology, 1988
- Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and alpha‐hydroxy‐midazolam following rectal and intravenous administration.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1988
- Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH bufferingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1988