Treatment of Obsessions: Relevant v. Irrelevant Exposure
- 1 October 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Vol. 9 (4), 322-329
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0141347300008065
Abstract
Six patients suffering from obsessional ruminations were treated with prolonged exposure in imagination. Two variants were compared in a cross-over design: (1) relevant exposure, consisting of exposure to the obsessions and (2) irrelevant exposure, consisting of exposure to ordinary frightening experiences. Relevant exposure proved to be significantly superior to irrelevant exposure. The data of this study suggest that habituation training by means of prolonged exposure to obsessions is a valuable treatment but not the panacea for the treatment of obsessional ruminations.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of obsessive-compulsive patients: The contribution of self-instructional training to the effectiveness of exposureBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1980
- Faradic disruption of obsessive ideation in the treatment of obsessive neurosis: A controlled studyBehavior Therapy, 1978
- Therapist-controlled exposure in vivo versus self-controlled exposure in vivo: A comparison with obsessive-compulsive patientsBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1977
- Obsessional ruminations: A comparison between thought-stopping and prolonged exposure in imaginationBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1977
- The physiological basis of implosive therapyBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1975
- Obsessive ruminations : a controlled trial of thought-stopping techniqueBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1973
- Obsessional ruminationsBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1971
- Relevant and irrelevant fear in flooding—A crossover study of phobic patientsBehavior Therapy, 1971
- The Leyton Obsessional InventoryPsychological Medicine, 1970
- A Self-Rating Depression ScaleArchives of General Psychiatry, 1965