Corneal Ectasia After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis in Patients Without Apparent Preoperative Risk Factors
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Cornea
- Vol. 25 (4), 388-403
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000222479.68242.77
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate patients who developed ectasia with no apparent preoperative risk factors. Methods: Potential cases of patients who developed ectasia without apparent risk factors were identified by contacting participants in the Kera-Net (n = 580), ASCRS-Net (n = 450), and ISRS/AAO ISRS-Net (n = 525) internet bulletin boards from April to October 2003. Cases were included if ectasia developed after laser in situ keratomileusis in the absence of apparent preoperative risk factors. Reported cases were excluded for the following reasons: (1) calculated residual stromal bed less than 250 μm, (2) preoperative central pachymetry less than 500 μm, (3) any keratometry reading greater than 47.2 diopters (D), (4) a calculated inferior-superior value greater than 1.4, (5) more than 2 retreatments, (6) attempted initial correction greater than −12.00 D, (7) an Orbscan II "posterior float" (if obtained) greater than 50 μm, and (8) surgical/flap complications. Results: A total of 27 eyes of 25 patients were submitted for consideration. Eight eyes (8 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 27.7 years (range, 18-41 years). Preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent was −4.61 D (range, −2.00 to −8.00 D); steepest keratometric reading was 43.86 D (range, 42.50-46.40 D); keratometric astigmatism was 0.93 D (range, 0.25-1.90 D); and preoperative central pachymetry was 537 μm (range, 505-560 μm). The mean calculated ablation depth was 82.8 μm (range, 21-125.4 μm), and mean calculated residual stromal bed was 299.5 μm (range, 254-373 μm). Mean time to recognition of ectasia onset was 14.2 months (range, 3-27 months) postoperatively. At the time of ectasia diagnosis, the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was −1.23 D (range, +0.125 to −3.00) with a mean of 2.72 D (range, 0.75-4.00 D) of astigmatism. Conclusions: Ectasia can occur after an otherwise uncomplicated laser in situ keratomileusis procedure, even in the absence of apparent preoperative risk factors.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic corneal imagingJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005
- The thick and thin of LASIK flapsJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- Flap thickness accuracyJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- Confocal microscopy evaluation of stromal ablation depth after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomyJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laserJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIKOphthalmology, 2003
- Role of Orbscan II in screening keratoconus suspects before refractive corneal surgeryOphthalmology, 2002
- Reproducibility of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Hansatome microkeratomeJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2000
- Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysisBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2000
- Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatismOphthalmology, 2000