Efficacy and effectiveness of the combination of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and a 3‐day course of artesunate for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in a refugee settlement in Zambia
Open Access
- 28 January 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Vol. 10 (2), 139-145
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01363.x
Abstract
In the Maheba Refugee Settlement, in the clinics supported by Medecins Sans Frontieres, all children aged up to 5 years with a confirmed diagnosis of uncomplicated falciparum malaria are treated with the combination of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) and artesunate (AS). We compared the treatment's efficacy and effectiveness. Patients were randomized in order to receive the treatment supervised (efficacy) or unsupervised (effectiveness). Therapeutic response was determined after 28 days of follow up. The difference between recrudescence and re-infection was ascertained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We also assessed genetic markers associated to SP resistance (dhfr and dhps). Eighty-five patients received treatment under supervision and 84 received it unsupervised. On day 28, and after PCR adjustment, efficacy was found to be 83.5% (95% CI: 74.1-90.5), and effectiveness 63.4% (95% CI: 52.6-73.3) (P < 0.01). Point mutations on dhfr (108) and dhps (437) were found for 92.0% and 44.2% respectively of the PCR samples analysed. The significant difference in therapeutic response after supervised and unsupervised treatment intake can only be explained by insufficient patient adherence. When implementing new malaria treatment policies, serious investment in ensuring patient adherence is essential to ascertain the effectiveness of the new treatment schedulesKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adherence to the combination of sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine and artesunate in the Maheba refugee settlement, ZambiaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2004
- Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2004
- Molecular Markers for Failure of Sulfadoxine‐Pyrimethamine and Chlorproguanil‐Dapsone Treatment ofPlasmodium falciparumMalariaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Combination Therapy for MalariaDrugs, 2002
- Can pretreatment screening for dhps and dhfr point mutations in Plasmodium falciparum infections be used to predict sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment failure?Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2001
- Chloroquine‐ and sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine‐resistant falciparum malaria in vivo– a pilot study in rural ZambiaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2000
- Efficacy of artesunate plus pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine for uncomplicated malaria in Gambian children: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Averting a malaria disasterThe Lancet, 1999
- Strategies for the prevention of antimalarial drug resistance: Rationale for combination chemotherapy for malariaParasitology Today, 1996
- Evidence that a point mutation in dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase confers resistance to pyrimethamine in falciparum malaria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1988