Absence of Sex Bias in the Referral of Patients for Cardiac Catheterization
Open Access
- 21 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 330 (16), 1101-1106
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199404213301601
Abstract
It has been suggested that women with clinical evidence of coronary artery disease are less often referred for cardiac catheterization than are men. To determine whether there is sex-related bias in referral for cardiac catheterization, we prospectively studied a cohort of 410 symptomatic outpatients (280 men and 130 women) who were being evaluated with exercise testing for possible coronary artery disease. Before the patients underwent exercise testing, 15 cardiologists from an academic medical center were asked to predict the probability that the patients they saw in the cardiology clinic would have angiographic evidence of any obstructive coronary disease (stenosis of 75 percent or more); the probability of severe coronary disease (three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease); the probability of left main coronary artery disease; and the probability of survival one, three, and five years after the evaluation. Similar predictions were generated by previously validated statistical models with use of data collected before exercise testing from the history, physical examination, and 12-lead electrocardiography with the patient at rest. Overall, women were referred for cardiac catheterization significantly less often than men (18 percent vs. 27 percent, P = 0.03). As compared with men, women had a significantly lower pretest probability of coronary disease (as estimated by their physicians) and a lower rate of positive exercise-test results. After accounting for differences in these two factors, sex was not an independent predictor of referral for catheterization. Comparing physicians' estimates of outcome with those generated by the statistical models revealed no evidence that the physicians were underestimating the risk of coronary disease in women. Furthermore, physicians' predictions did not underestimate the probability of any obstructive coronary disease in men and women who subsequently underwent catheterization. Academic cardiologists made appropriately lower pretest predictions of categories of disease in women with possible coronary artery disease than in men, and these assessments, along with women's lower rate of positive exercise tests, rather than bias based on sex, accounted for the lower rate of catheterization among women. .Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute myocardial infarction in the Medicare population. Process of care and clinical outcomesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Referral Patterns for Coronary Artery Disease Treatment: Gender Bias or Good Clinical Judgment?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention RegistryArchives of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Prognostic Value of a Treadmill Exercise Score in Outpatients with Suspected Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Sex Differences in the Management of Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Differences in the Use of Procedures between Women and Men Hospitalized for Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Prediction of death and myocardial infarction by radionuclide angiocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS).Circulation, 1981
- Natural history of angina pectoris in the Framingham study: Prognosis and survivalThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1972