Comparison of body fat estimation using waist:height ratio using different ‘waist’ measurements in Australian adults
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 100 (5), 1135-1141
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114508966095
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to determine differences in predicting total and regional adiposity using the waist:height ratio (WHtR) calculated using different ‘waist’ measurements. Body composition of ninety-five males and 121 female Australian adults (aged 20 years and above) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The WHtR was calculated using: (1) the narrowest point between the lower costal border and the top of the iliac crest (WHtR-W), and (2) at the level of the umbilicus (WHtR-A). Relationships between calculated WHtR and measured body composition, such as percentage body fat (%BF) and percentage trunk fat (%TF) were determined. Values obtained from WHtR-A were significantly greater than WHtR-W in both groups (P < 0·05). While no correlation differences between WHtR-W and WHtR-A in relation to body composition variables were observed, females showed significantly lower correlation with lean mass compared with BMI. Regression analyses showed that neither WHtR had an age influence on %TF estimation. Estimated %BF and %TF were comparable for both WHtR and also with estimated values using a BMI of 25 kg/m2. Sensitivity of excess %BF and %TF increased by using WHtR-A, particularly in females. In conclusion, the umbilicus measurement may be better than using the narrowest site in the WHtR calculation, particularly in females. To improve the screening ability of the WHtR and make comparisons between studies easier there may be a need to standardise the measurement location. Further studies are recommended to confirm the findings across different ethnic groups.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Index of central obesity – A novel parameterMedical Hypotheses, 2007
- Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndromeNature, 2006
- Metabolic syndrome in Japanese men and women with special reference to the anthropometric criteria for the assessment of obesity: Proposal to use the waist-to-height ratioPreventive Medicine, 2005
- Assessing obesity: are ethnic differences in body mass index and waist classification criteria justified?Obesity Reviews, 2005
- Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesityInternational Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 2005
- The Epidemiology of Central Fat Distribution in Relation to DiseaseNutrition Reviews, 2004
- Measures of abdominal obesity assessed for visceral adiposity and relation to coronary riskInternational Journal of Obesity, 2004
- Intra-abdominal obesity and metabolic risk factors: a study of young adultsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2003
- Waist-to-height ratio, a simple and practical index for assessing central fat distribution and metabolic risk in Japanese men and womenInternational Journal of Obesity, 2003
- Relationship of the body mass index with skinfolds, girths, and bone breadths in canadian men and women aged 20–70 yearsAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1988