Recruiting a Probability Sample for an Online Panel
- 10 September 2012
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Public Opinion Quarterly
- Vol. 76 (3), 470-490
- https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs037
Abstract
An experiment was carried out to determine the optimal recruitment strategy for a new online household panel. The factors to be optimized were contact mode, incentive amount, timing of the incentive, content of the advance letter, and timing of the panel participation request. The experimental design took into account the “naturally” varying factor of whether or not the households involved had a known fixed landline. Contact was made by either telephone (CATI) or face-to-face (CAPI). The results showed equivalent contact and recruitment rates for CATI and CAPI for households with a known telephone number. The contact rate was substantially lower for households without a known telephone number, even when controlling for the effect of contact mode. The response rates were not affected by the content of the advance letter. Response rates were also independent of whether the nature of the panel study was explained before or after the recruitment interview was completed.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the InternetSocial Science Research, 2009
- Methodology of Longitudinal SurveysPublished by Wiley ,2009
- Computing Response Metrics for Online PanelsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2008
- The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys: A Meta-AnalysisPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2007
- The Impact of Material Incentives on Response Quantity, Response Quality, Sample Composition, Survey Outcome and Cost in Online Access PanelsInternational Journal of Market Research, 2004
- Web SurveysPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2000
- The quality of survey data: Telephone versus face-to-face interviewsTransportation, 1998
- Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-AnalysisPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1993
- Understanding The Decision to Participate in a SurveyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1992
- Face-to-face advance contact and monetary incentives effects on mail survey return rates, response differences, and survey costsJournal of Business Research, 1986