Per-Sextant Localization and Staging of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Imaging Findings with Whole-Mount Step Section Histopathology
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 188 (1), 84-90
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.06.0401
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of 1.5-T prostatic MRI for per-sextant tumor localization and staging of prostate cancer as compared with whole-mount step section histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Combined endorectal-pelvic phased-array prostatic MRI scans obtained at 1.5 T of 106 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who had undergone radical prostatectomy with whole-mount step section histopathology within 28 days of MRI were retrospectively analyzed by three independent abdominal radiologists (reviewers 1, 2, and 3). Sextants of the prostate (right and left base, middle, and apex) were evaluated for the presence of prostate cancer and extracapsular extension (ECE) using a 5-point confidence scale. Data were statistically analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Interobserver variability was assessed by kappa statistics. For calculation of sensitivity and specificity, data from the 5-point confidence scale were dichotomized into negative (score of 1-3) or positive (score of 4 or 5) findings. RESULTS. Forty-one patients had ECE (tumor stage T3), and 65 patients had organ-confined disease (stage T2). Of 636 prostatic sextants, 417 were positive for prostate cancer and 135 were positive for ECE at histopathology. For prostate cancer localization, ROC analysis yielded area under the ROC curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.776 ± 0.023 (SD) to 0.832 ± 0.027. For the detection of ECE, the AUC values ranged from 0.740 ± 0.054 to 0.812 ± 0.045. Interobserver agreement (κ) ranged from 0.49 to 0.60 for prostate cancer localization and from 0.59 to 0.67 for the detection of ECE. CONCLUSION. Using the sextant framework, independent observers reach similar accuracy with moderate to substantial agreement for the localization of prostate cancer and ECE by means of MRI of the prostate.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns and trends in prostate cancer incidence, survival, prevalence and mortality. Part I: international comparisonsBJU International, 2002
- Characterization of low-intensity lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate on pre-biopsy endorectal coil MR imagingEuropean Radiology, 2001
- Localized Prostate Cancer: Effect of Hormone Deprivation Therapy Measured by Using Combined Three-dimensional1H MR Spectroscopy and MR Imaging: Clinicopathologic Case-controlled StudyRadiology, 2001
- SEXTANT LOCALIZATION OF PROSTATE CANCER: COMPARISON OF SEXTANT BIOPSY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING WITH STEP SECTION HISTOLOGYJournal of Urology, 2000
- Prostate Cancer: Localization with Three-dimensional Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging—Clinicopathologic StudyRadiology, 1999
- Prostate Cancer: Prediction of Extracapsular Extension with Endorectal MR Imaging and Three-dimensional Proton MR Spectroscopic ImagingRadiology, 1999
- Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Prostate carcinoma: MR imaging findings after cryosurgery.Radiology, 1996
- Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal--pelvic phased-array coils.Radiology, 1994
- Prostate and seminal vesicles after irradiation: MR appearanceJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1991