Models of evolution
- 22 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences
- Vol. 219 (1216), 315-325
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1983.0076
Abstract
Different ways in which evolution can be modelled will be reviewed. Two asexual models -- `Muller's ratchet' and a model due to Eigen and Schuster -- both lead to the conclusion that the accuracy of replication must reach a limiting value, but the details are different. In classic population genetics models, difficulties arise if fitnesses depend on interactions with others. Two approaches -- `trait group' methods, and game theory -- are discussed. If the interacting individuals are relatives, there is again a choice between the exact `neighbour-modulated fitness' approach and the more intuitive `inclusive fitness' method. A more drastic change in the nature of the model arises if the units of the evolving system are not individual organisms, but either genes or species. There are conceptual difficulties which must be clarified before species selection can be analysed mathematically.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How not to measure inclusive fitnessNature, 1982
- Group selection is implicated in the evolution of female-biased sex ratiosNature, 1981
- Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin SelectionZeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie, 1979
- The HypercyclePublished by Springer Nature ,1979
- Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1978
- Does Muller's ratchet work with selfing?Genetics Research, 1978
- Darwinian selection and “altruism”Theoretical Population Biology, 1978
- Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsideredPaleobiology, 1977
- The Units of SelectionAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1970
- Extraordinary Sex RatiosScience, 1967