The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension
Open Access
- 28 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Vol. 5 (1), 18
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-5-18
Abstract
Background: Increasing evidence suggests that ABPM more closely predicts target organ damage than does clinic measurement. Future guidelines may suggest ABPM as routine in the diagnosis and monitoring of hypertension. This would create difficulties as this test is expensive and often difficult to obtain. The purpose of this study is to determine the degree to which the BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor predicts results on 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods: A quantitative analysis comparing blood pressure measured by the BpTRU device with the mean daytime blood pressure on 24 hour ABPM. The study was conducted by the Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada on adult primary care patients who are enrolled in two randomized controlled trials on hypertension. The main outcomes were the mean of the blood pressures measured at the three most recent office visits, the initial measurement on the BpTRU-100, the mean of the five measurements on the BpTRU monitor, and the daytime average on 24 hour ABPM. Results: The group mean of the three charted clinic measured blood pressures (150.8 (SD10.26) / 82.9 (SD 8.44)) was not statistically different from the group mean of the initial reading on BpTRU (150.0 (SD21.33) / 83.3 (SD12.00)). The group mean of the average of five BpTRU readings (140.0 (SD17.71) / 79.8 (SD 10.46)) was not statistically different from the 24 hour daytime mean on ABPM (141.5 (SD 13.25) / 79.7 (SD 7.79)). Within patients, BpTRU average correlated significantly better with daytime ambulatory pressure than did clinic averages (BpTRU r = 0.571, clinic r = 0.145). Based on assessment of sensitivity and specificity at different cut-points, it is suggested that the initial treatment target using the BpTRU be set at <135/85 mmHG, but achievement of target should be confirmed using 24 hour ABPM. Conclusion: The BpTRU average better predicts ABPM than does the average of the blood pressures recorded on the patient chart from the three most recent visits. The BpTRU automatic clinic blood pressure monitor should be used as an adjunct to ABPM to effectively diagnose and monitor hypertension.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- White-coat effect in normotension and hypertensionBlood Pressure Monitoring, 2002
- Risk of cardiovascular disease in relation to achieved office and ambulatory blood pressure control in treated hypertensive subjectsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Reference values for ambulatory blood pressure and self-measured blood pressure based on prospective outcome dataBlood Pressure Monitoring, 2001
- Ambulatory monitoring for prediction of cardiac and cerebral eventsBlood Pressure Monitoring, 2001
- Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100 Beta ) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometerBlood Pressure Monitoring, 2001
- Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitorBlood Pressure Monitoring, 2001
- Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Using Conventional vs Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Older Patients With Systolic HypertensionJAMA, 1999
- Validation of the A&D TM-2430 device for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and evaluation of performance according to subjects' characteristics.1998
- Risk factors associated with alterations in carotid intima—media thickness in hypertensionJournal Of Hypertension, 1998
- Relationship of 24-Hour Blood Pressure Mean and Variability to Severity of Target-Organ Damage in HypertensionJournal Of Hypertension, 1987