DIAGNOSIS OF PERIPROSTHETIC INFECTION
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Vol. 88 (4), 869-882
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200604000-00026
Abstract
Periprosthetic infections are rare, but there is evidence to suggest that their frequency may be underestimated. No single laboratory test has perfect sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing infection. Most tests have better specificity when they are performed for patients in whom infection is suspected clinically rather than when they are used as screening tests. Screening test results that may suggest the possibility of infection include elevation of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and/or serum C-reactive protein level more than three months after an arthroplasty. Most serologic tests are difficult to interpret when the patient has an underlying inflammatory arthropathy. Cultures of aspirated joint fluid can be especially helpful for patients who have symptoms suggestive of infection, but their results are best interpreted two weeks after administration of antibiotics has been discontinued. Joint fluid cell counts may also be helpful, but Gram stains of joint fluid have poor sensitivity and specificity. Criteria for diagnosing infection on the basis of frozen sections of implant membranes have not yet been standardized, but in many laboratories more than five neutrophils per high-power field in five or more fields (excluding surface fibrin) has been found to be suggestive of infection. Most polymerase chain reactions that detect the universal 16S rRNA bacterial gene have problems with false-positive results, but combining a universal polymerase chain reaction with subsequent bacterial sequencing can help improve specificity. Polymerase chain reactions can detect necrotic bacteria, so the clinical importance of positive results of this analysis in the absence of other features of infection remains to be determined.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE MARK COVENTRY AWARD: White Blood Cell Gene ExpressionPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2005
- A Molecular Gram Stain Using Broad Range PCR and Pyrosequencing TechnologyDiagnostic Molecular Pathology, 2005
- Is “Aseptic” Loosening of the Prosthetic Cup after Total Hip Replacement Due to Nonculturable Bacterial Pathogens in Patients with Low‐Grade Infection?Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Presence of Bacterial Phage-Like DNA Sequences in Commercial Taq DNA Polymerase ReagentsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Adherent endotoxin mediates biological responses of titanium particles without stimulating their phagocytosisJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2002
- The effect of particle wear debris on NFκB activation and pro‐inflammatory cytokine release in differentiated THP‐1 cellsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2001
- 99Tcm-polyclonal IgG scintigraphy in the detection of infected hip and knee prosthesesNuclear Medicine Communications, 1997
- Appearance of septic hip prostheses on plain radiographs.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994
- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Infected and Non-Infected total Hip ArthroplastiesActa Orthopaedica, 1978
- Postoperative infection in total prosthetic replacement arthroplasty of the hip-joint with special reference to the bacterial content of the air of the operating roomBritish Journal of Surgery, 1969