Comparison of Biochemical Markers of Bone Resorption in Patients with Metabolic and Malignant Bone Diseases
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
- Vol. 33 (5), 421-427
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329603300504
Abstract
The clinical usefulness of the urinary excretion of three bone resorption markers is compared in patients after renal transplantation and in tumour patients with and without bone metastases. The markers were the 3-hydroxypyridinium derivatives pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline (pyridinium cross-links; measured by a polyclonal enzyme immunoassay), the cross-linked N-telopeptid-to-helix domain of type I collagen and the destruction products of type I collagen metabolism cross-reacting with a peptide sequence of the α1-chain of the C-terminal telopeptide region of type I collagen (CrossLaps™). In patients receiving renal transplantation the discriminating power of N-telopeptides was superior to that of pyridinium cross-links and CrossLaps™, with Z scores (number of SDs from apparently healthy controls) of 6·61, 2·17 and 1·35, respectively. However, the pyridinium cross-links were the only markers for bone resorption which showed a significant increase with time ( P < 0·001). Receiver operating-characteristic analysis for discriminating patients with bone metastases from those without revealed that the accuracy was 0·81 for pyridinium cross-links, 0·76 for the N-telopeptides and 0·61 for CrossLaps™. The discriminating power for patients with bone metastases was higher for pyridinium cross-links and N-telopeptides than for CrossLaps™, with Z scores (number of SDs from patients without bone metastases) of 4·38, 3·00 and 1·24, respectively. Linear correlation coefficients for the different markers were between + 0·35 and + 0·65 in patients receiving renal transplants, and between + 0·58 and + 0·84 in patients with bone metastases. In conclusion, in patients with metabolic and malignant bone diseases there are marked differences in the diagnostic performance of different biochemical markers of bone resorption. It is suggested that this may reflect the different facets of bone resorption or the different metabolic fates of the marker substances examined.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Urinary concentration of a specific peptide of type I collagen of bone (CrossLapsTM): correlation to hydroxyprolineScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1995
- Immunoassay for quantifying type I collagen degradation products in urine evaluatedClinical Chemistry, 1994
- Collagen Cross-Link Metabolites in Urine as Markers of Bone Metastases in Prostatic CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1994
- Monitoring of osteoblast activity with an immunoradiometric assay for determination of bone alkaline phosphatase mass concentration in patients receiving renal transplantsClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1994
- Monitoring bone resorption in early postmenopausal women by an immunoassay for cross-linked collagen peptides in urineJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1994
- Bone resorption rates in children monitored by the urinary assay of collagen type I cross-linked peptidesBone, 1994
- Specificity of urinary excretion of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen as a marker of bone turnoverCalcified Tissue International, 1994
- A specific immunoassay for monitoring human bone resorption: Quantitation of type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides in urineJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992
- Statistische MethodenPublished by Springer Nature ,1988