The Other Side of the Hidden Curriculum: Correspondence Theories and the Labor Process
Open Access
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Education
- Vol. 162 (1), 47-66
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748016200105
Abstract
Many analyses of the hidden curriculum have been strongly influenced by correspondence theories, theories which posit a mirror image relationship between the norms and values taught in school and those “required” in the economy. Correspondence theories, however, often miss the elements of resistence, contradiction, and relative autonomy that occur in schools and in the workplace. Studies of the work culture document the past and continued existence of such elements, elements which mediate and can provide the potential for transforming the pressures for social reproduction. We must be very careful of romanticizing such resistance, however, for the terms are often set by owners, not workers. The existence of resistence and contradiction is important, though, since it provides for the possibility of educational action in the face of the power of the hidden curriculum.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Correspondence Theories of the Hidden Curriculum MissThe Review of Education, 1979
- Reification and Utopia in Mass CultureSocial Text, 1979
- Film: The Art Form of Late CapitalismSocial Text, 1979
- Mass Media: From Collective Experience to the Culture of PrivatizationSocial Text, 1979
- Marx, Braverman, and the Logic of CapitalInsurgent Sociologist, 1978
- The Social Relations of Production At the Point of ProductionInsurgent Sociologist, 1978
- Structuring School StructureHarvard Educational Review, 1978
- Workers’ control of machine production in the nineteenth century∗Labor History, 1976
- Labor and Monopoly CapitalMonthly Review, 1974
- Nicos Poulantzas and the Marxist Theory of the StatePolitics & Society, 1974