Compensation, Turnover, and Top Management Incentives: Historical Evidence
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Journal of Business
- Vol. 70 (2), 153-187
- https://doi.org/10.1086/209714
Abstract
We find that the rate of top management turnover and the sensitivity of turnover to stock returns for a sample of large industrial firms from 1933 to 1941 was significantly smaller than estimates reported for modern panels. We present evidence that management compensation has become more sensitive to firm performance since the 1930s. In contrast to the conclusions of Jensen and Murphy and others, our findings indicate that management incentives under control of the board have become stronger rather than weaker over the past half century. These findings are consistent with internal and external control mechanisms functioning as complements.This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Constraints on Executive Compensation: Evidence from the Electric Utility IndustryThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1996
- Free Cash Flow, Shareholder Value, and the Undistributed Profits Tax of 1936 and 1937The Journal of Finance, 1994
- Top Executive Rewards and Firm Performance: A Comparison of Japan and the United StatesJournal of Political Economy, 1994
- Corporate Performance, Corporate Takeovers, and Management TurnoverThe Journal of Finance, 1991
- Stock prices and top management changesJournal of Financial Economics, 1988
- Outside directors and CEO turnoverJournal of Financial Economics, 1988
- Management ownership and market valuationJournal of Financial Economics, 1988
- Organization Form, Residual Claimants, and Corporate ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Ownership and Compensation as Incentives to Corporation ExecutivesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1940