A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 98 (2), 134-144
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70007-y
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical management of the acrylic splint Herbst applianceAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988
- Fabrication of the acrylic splint Herbst applianceAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988
- Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patientsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1985
- A method of cephalometric evaluationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1984
- An examination of treatment changes in children treated with the function regulator of FränkelAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1983
- Fra¨nkel appliance therapy: Orthopedic or orthodontic?American Journal of Orthodontics, 1983
- Arch width development in Class II patients treated with the Fränkel applianceAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1982
- Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst applianceAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1979
- Decrowding during eruption under the screening influence of vestibular shieldsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1974
- The treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with functional correctorsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1969