Feasibility Study: Watchful Waiting For Localized Low To Intermediate Grade Prostate Carcinoma With Selective Delayed Intervention Based On Prostate Specific Antigen, Histological And/Or Clinical Progression
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 167 (4), 1664-1669
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65174-9
Abstract
We assessed the feasibility of a watchful waiting protocol with selective delayed intervention using clinical, prostate specific antigen (PSA) or histological progression as treatment indications for clinically localized prostate cancer. In this prospective, single arm cohort study patients with favorable clinical parameters (stage T1b to T2b N0M0, Gleason score 7 or less and PSA 15 ng./ml. or less) are conservatively treated with watchful waiting. When a patient meets disease progression criteria, arbitrarily defined by the 3 parameters of the rate of PSA increase, clinical progression or histological upgrade on repeat prostate biopsy, appropriate treatment is implemented. Patients are followed every 3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. Serum PSA measurement and digital rectal examination are done at each visit and repeat prostate biopsy is performed 18 months after study enrollment. Since November 1995, the study has accrued 206 patients with a median followup of 29 months (range 2 to 66). Of these men 137 remain on the surveillance protocol with no disease progression, while 69 were withdrawn from study for various reasons. There was clinical, PSA and histological progression in 16, 15 and 5 cases, respectively. The estimated actuarial probability of remaining on the surveillance protocol was 67% at 2 years and 48% at 4. The probability of remaining progression-free was 81% and 67% at 2 and 4 years, respectively. A policy of watchful waiting with selectively delayed intervention based on predefined criteria of disease progression is feasible. This strategy offers the benefit of an individualized approach based on the demonstrated risk of clinical or biochemical progression with time and, thus, it may decrease the burden of therapy in patients with indolent disease, while providing definitive therapy for those with biologically active disease.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimatorsStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- Population-based study of long-term survival in patients with clinically localised prostate cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- Expectant Management of Early Stage Prostatic Cancer: Swedish ExperienceJournal of Urology, 1994
- Natural History of Changes in Prostate Specific Antigen in Early Stage Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994
- Results of Conservative Management of Clinically Localized Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A decision analysis of alternative treatment strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research TeamPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- A structured literature review of treatment for localized prostate cancer. Prostate Disease Patient Outcome Research TeamArchives of Family Medicine, 1993
- Latent Prostatic Cancer in a Consecutive Autopsy SeriesScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1980
- Etiology, epidemiology, and pathology of prostatic cancerCancer, 1973
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958