Are replicate evaluations of triangle tests during a session good practice?
- 30 November 1997
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Food Quality and Preference
- Vol. 8 (5-6), 367-372
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3293(97)00045-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Who told you the triangle test was simple?Food Quality and Preference, 1995
- Probabilistic models for sequential taste effects in triadic choice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- A THEORETICAL NOTE ON DIFFERENCE TESTS: MODELS, PARADOXES AND COGNITIVE STRATEGIESJournal of Sensory Studies, 1994
- The Warm‐up Effect as a Means of Increasing the Discriminability of Sensory Difference TestsJournal of Food Science, 1988
- Effectiveness of Sensory Difference Tests: Sequential Sensitivity Analysis for Liquid Food StimuliJournal of Food Science, 1986
- A Comparison of Sensory Difference Testing Procedures: Sequential Sensitivity Analysis and Aspects of Taste AdaptationJournal of Food Science, 1985
- The two‐factor triangle testInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology, 1982
- Incidental training in the Triangular MethodChemical Senses, 1982
- Threshold determination by triangle testing: effects of judgemental procedure, positional bias and incidental trainingChemical Senses, 1979
- THE EFFECT OF DURATION OF INTERVALS BETWEEN OLFACTORY STIMULI IN THE TRIANGULAR METHODChemical Senses, 1977