Perceptual Vigilance and Defense Revisited: Evidence against Blum's Psychoanalytic Theory of Subliminal Perception
- 1 December 1975
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 41 (3), 723-729
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1975.41.3.723
Abstract
Blum's (1954) interpretation of psychoanalytic theory leads him to predict that Ss will defend against a threatening stimulus which is just below a recognition threshold and be vigilant toward the same stimulus when it is farther below the same threshold. 7 males and 9 females were presented the same four Blacky pictures, at the same speed and illumination, and using the same procedure as Blum. The results offered no support for the theory of perceptual vigilance or defense. The many weaknesses inherent in Blum's theory and supporting methodology were discussed.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Subliminal Stimuli on Dreams: Further Evidence against the Spence-Holland TheoryPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1972
- Perceptual defense revisited.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955
- An experimental reunion of psychoanalytic theory with perceptual vigilance and defense.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1954