Modeling the Impact of Soil and Water Conservation on Surface and Ground Water Based on the SCS and Visual Modflow
Open Access
- 11 November 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (11), e79103
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079103
Abstract
Soil and water conservation measures can impact hydrological cycle, but quantitative analysis of this impact is still difficult in a watershed scale. To assess the effect quantitatively, a three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model (MODFLOW) with a surface runoff model–the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) were calibrated and applied based on the artificial rainfall experiments. Then, three soil and water conservation scenarios were simulated on the sand-box model to assess the effect of bare slope changing to grass land and straw mulching on water volume, hydraulic head, runoff process of groundwater and surface water. Under the 120 mm rainfall, 60 mm/h rainfall intensity, 5 m2 area, 3° slope conditions, the comparative results indicated that the trend was decrease in surface runoff and increase in subsurface runoff coincided with the land-use converted from bare slope to grass land and straw mulching. The simulated mean surface runoff modulus was 3.64×10−2 m3/m2/h in the bare slope scenario, while the observed values were 1.54×10−2 m3/m2/h and 0.12×10−2 m3/m2/h in the lawn and straw mulching scenarios respectively. Compared to the bare slope, the benefits of surface water reduction were 57.8% and 92.4% correspondingly. At the end of simulation period (T = 396 min), the simulated mean groundwater runoff modulus was 2.82×10−2 m3/m2/h in the bare slope scenario, while the observed volumes were 3.46×10−2 m3/m2/h and 4.91×10−2 m3/m2/h in the lawn and straw mulching scenarios respectively. So the benefits of groundwater increase were 22.7% and 60.4% correspondingly. It was concluded that the soil and water conservation played an important role in weakening the surface runoff and strengthening the underground runoff. Meanwhile the quantitative analysis using a modeling approach could provide a thought for the study in a watershed scale to help decision-makers manage water resources.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sediment discharge of the Yellow River, China: Past, present and future—A synthesisActa Oceanologica Sinica, 2015
- Effect of Drainage and Management Practices on Hydrology of Pine PlantationPublished by American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) ,2013
- Impacts of changes in climate and land use/land cover under IPCC RCP scenarios on streamflow in the Hoeya River Basin, KoreaScience of The Total Environment, 2013
- Modelling the impact of forest cover on groundwater resources: A case study of the Sherwood Sandstone aquifer in the East Midlands, UKJournal of Hydrology, 2010
- Streamflow Response to Climate and Landuse Changes in a Coastal Watershed in North CarolinaTransactions of the ASABE, 2009
- Simulation of land use impacts on groundwater levels and streamflow in a Virginia watershedAgricultural Water Management, 2008
- Impact of land-use patterns on distributed groundwater recharge and dischargeChinese Geographical Science, 2006
- Evaluation of AMC-Dependent SCS-CN-Based Models Using Watershed CharacteristicsWater Resources Management, 2006
- The effect of land use/cover change on surface runoff in Shenzhen region, ChinaCATENA, 2006
- The Mechanism of Natural Ground‐Water Recharge and Discharge: 1. One‐dimensional, Vertical, Unsteady, Unsaturated Flow above a Recharging or Discharging Ground‐Water Flow SystemWater Resources Research, 1969