Implications of Volume of Nodal Metastasis in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 133 (4), 617-619
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49112-9
Abstract
Cases (73) of pelvic nodal metastases from prostatic cancer were divided into subgroups based upon the volume and extent of nodal disease. Of the patients with gross nodal disease 15% survived 5 yr without progression compared to 27% of those with microscopic involvement of > 1 node and 44% with a single positive node. On the other hand, 52% of the patients with gross disease died of prostatic cancer within 5 yr compared to 37% of those with multiple microscopic nodes and 28% with a single node. Although other variables also influence prognosis, the differences in survival demonstrable within these subgroups may have important implications regarding selection of therapy and interpretation of treatment results.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of External Irradiation on Local Symptoms and Survival Free of Disease in Patients with Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis from Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1984
- Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis from Prostatic Cancer: Influence of Tumor Grade and Stage in 452 Consecutive PatientsJournal of Urology, 1983
- 125I implantation for carcinoma of prostate Further follow-up of first 100 casesUrology, 1982
- Extended Field Radiation Therapy Versus Delayed Hormonal Therapy in Node Positive Prostatic AdenocarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1982
- Radical Prostatectomy for Stage B2 Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1982
- Radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for high-stage cancer of the prostateCancer, 1981
- Nodal Involvement as A Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Prostatic CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1980
- Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Relationship of Grade and Local Extent to the Pattern of MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1977