Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review
Top Cited Papers
- 3 March 2001
- Vol. 322 (7285), 517-519
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the feasibility of detecting adverse events through record review in British hospitals and to make preliminary estimates of the incidence and costs of adverse events. Design: Retrospective review of 1014 medical and nursing records. Setting: Two acute hospitals in Greater London area. Main outcome measure: Number of adverse events. Results: 110 (10.8%) patients experienced an adverse event, with an overall rate of adverse events of 11.7% when multiple adverse events were included. About half of these events were judged preventable with ordinary standards of care. A third of adverse events led to moderate or greater disability or death. Conclusions: These results suggest that adverse events are a serious source of harm to patients and a large drain on NHS resources. Some are major events; others are frequent, minor events that go unnoticed in routine clinical care but together have massive economic consequencesKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology of medical errorBMJ, 2000
- The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992Surgery, 1999
- Risk, safety, and the dark side of qualityBMJ, 1997
- The Quality in Australian Health Care StudyThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1995
- The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991