Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genes & Development
- Vol. 21 (15), 1921-1936
- https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.432107
Abstract
DNA topoisomerases solve topological problems during chromosome metabolism. We investigated where and when Top1 and Top2 are recruited on replicating chromosomes and how their inactivation affects fork integrity and DNA damage checkpoint activation. We show that, in the context of replicating chromatin, Top1 and Top2 act within a 600-base-pair (bp) region spanning the moving forks. Top2 exhibits additional S-phase clusters at specific intergenic loci, mostly containing promoters. TOP1 ablation does not affect fork progression and stability and does not cause activation of the Rad53 checkpoint kinase. top2 mutants accumulate sister chromatid junctions in S phase without affecting fork progression and activate Rad53 at the M–G1 transition. top1 top2 double mutants exhibit fork block and processing and phosphorylation of Rad53 and γH2A in S phase. The exonuclease Exo1 influences fork processing and DNA damage checkpoint activation in top1 top2 mutants. Our data are consistent with a coordinated action of Top1 and Top2 in counteracting the accumulation of torsional stress and sister chromatid entanglement at replication forks, thus preventing the diffusion of topological changes along large chromosomal regions. A failure in resolving fork-related topological constrains during S phase may therefore result in abnormal chromosome transitions, DNA damage checkpoint activation, and chromosome breakage during segregation.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Functional interactions of DNA topoisomerases with a human replication originThe EMBO Journal, 2007
- Sister chromatid junctions in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricusThe EMBO Journal, 2007
- A mitotic topoisomerase II checkpoint in budding yeast is required for genome stability but acts independently of Pds1/securinGenes & Development, 2006
- Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replicationNature Cell Biology, 2006
- Chromatin and the DNA damage responseDNA Repair, 2005
- Does looping and clustering in the nucleus regulate gene expression?Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2004
- Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 Checkpoint Kinase during Adaptation from DNA Damage–Induced G2/M ArrestMolecular Cell, 2001
- Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymeraseThe EMBO Journal, 1999
- Function of DNA topoisomerases as replication swivels in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeJournal of Molecular Biology, 1989
- Metaphase chromosome structureJournal of Molecular Biology, 1986