Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis
- 3 June 1995
- Vol. 310 (6992), 1433-1438
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6992.1433
Abstract
Objective: To assess treatment discontinuation rates with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants. Design: Meta-analysis of 62 randomised controlled trials. Subjects: 6029 patients with major unipolar depression. Main outcome measures: Pooled risk ratios for drop out rates with respect to all cases of discontinuation and those due to side effects and treatment failure. Results: The total discontinuation rate was 10% lower with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors than with tricyclic antidepressants (risk ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.97) and the drop out rate due to side effects was 25% lower (risk ratio 0.75; 0.66 to 0.84). There was no significant difference between drug classes in the drop out rates for treatment failure. The risk ratios for drop out did not differ significantly between individual selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Conclusions: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are better tolerated than tricyclic antidepressants as measured by total numbers of drop outs. The definite advantage to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is explained by fewer drop outs due to side effects. The overall difference, however, is comparatively small and may not be clinically relevant. Analyses of cost effectiveness should not overestimate the advantage to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Key messages In a meta-analysis of randomised, short term clinical trials selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were associated with 10% fewer overall drop outs than tricyclic antidepressants (nine drop outs for every 10 with tricyclic agents) This difference was accounted for by a lower rate of drop out related to side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (25% reduction; three drop outs for every four with tricyclic agents) This comparatively small difference in drop out rate is of uncertain importance clinically and when cost effectiveness is considered Further studies of the tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with that of tricyclic antidepressants are required over a longer period in the setting of clinical practice rather than clinical trialsKeywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of fluoxetine and imipramine in the treatment of outpatients with major depressive disorderActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1993
- A Multicentre Double Blind Trial of Fluoxetine versus Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Depressive IllnessAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1993
- Comparative Efficacy of AntidepressantsDrugs, 1992
- Double‐blind comparative multicentre study of fluvoxamine and mianserin in the treatment of major depressive episode in elderly peopleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1991
- Paroxetine in the treatment of depression: a comparison with imipramine and placeboActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1989
- Meta‐analysis of early phase I1 studies with paroxetine in hospitalized depressed patientsActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1989
- A Comparative Trial of a New Antidepressant, FluoxetineThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987
- A double‐blind comparison of citalopram (Lu 10–171) and amitriptyline in depressed patientsActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- The course of manic-depressive illnessJournal of Affective Disorders, 1982