Waterfront Reform in Britain and Australia—In Practice and in Principle
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Industrial Relations
- Vol. 34 (2), 229-246
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002218569203400203
Abstract
In 1989 industry-wide employment arrangements in Britain's docks and on the Australian wharves were abandoned in favour of company- or enterprise-level arrangements. In both countries waterfront reform was a response to industrial relations problems and economic inefficiency, but there the similarity ends. In Britain the abolition of the National Dock Labour Scheme has unleashed a cost-cutting exercise of unparalleled proportions, with massive job losses and new working practices implemented almost literally overnight. This has produced a short-term fillip to productivity, but has failed to address many of the industry's underlying problems. In contrast, the three-year In-Principle Agreement negotiated in Australia has produced less spectacular changes but has laid the foundations for long-term structural reform.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Did Devlin Fail? Casualism and Conflict on the DocksBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1991
- Labour Market Deregulation and Economic Performance: The Case of Britain's DocksWork, Employment & Society, 1991
- Two Models of Award Restructuring in AustraliaLabour and Industry, 1990
- Trade Unions, Technological Change and Redundancy Protection in AustraliaJournal of Industrial Relations, 1982
- The Impact of the National Stevedoring Industry Conference (1965-67) on Industrial Relations on the Australian WaterfrontJournal of Industrial Relations, 1978