A Holistic Approach to the Integration of Safety Applications: The INSAFES Subproject Within the European Framework Programme 6 Integrating Project PReVENT
- 15 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Vol. 11 (3), 554-566
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2009.2036736
Abstract
This paper deals with the integration of multiple advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) in a holistic driver-support system. The paper presents the results of a project named Integrated Safety Systems (INSAFES), which was part of PReVENT: an integrating project carried out under the European Framework Programme 6. Integration in INSAFES is tackled at three different levels in the framework of a “cognitive car” perspective: 1) at the perception level, to represent the world around the vehicle, including object-tracking between sensor fields and the detection of driver intentions; 2) at the decision level, to reproduce humanlike holistic motion plans, which serve as “reference maneuvers” to evaluate the motion alternatives that a driver faces; and 3) at the level of interaction with the driver and vehicle control ( action level), to arbitrate between the requests of functions competing for driver attention. A function that provides simultaneous longitudinal and lateral support has been developed. It gives support for safe speed, safe distance, lane change, and all-around collision avoidance all at the same time. At its core, there is a tool (evasive/reference maneuver) that constantly evaluates two possible alternatives (in lane and evasive/lane change) and compares them with the driver input to detect which one applies, which dictates warnings and driver interactions, and whether there is a better alternative. In addition, a “warning manager” has been developed, acting like a referee who lets the ADAS applications work standalone and then combines the requests of each application, prioritizes them, and manages the interaction with the user. The warning manager can be particularly useful in the case of integration of pre-existing standalone functions, which can be quickly reused. If a holistic ADAS is developed, the warning manager can still be used to combine it with IVIS functions. In fact, depending on the kind of ADAS and IVIS considered, the most suitable approach can be either to combine functions in a unified multifunctional driver-support application or to arbitrate between them through the warning manager.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidanceControl Engineering Practice, 2008
- Junior: The Stanford entry in the Urban ChallengeJournal of Field Robotics, 2008
- Human driving data-based design of a vehicle adaptive cruise control algorithmVehicle System Dynamics, 2008
- The “cognitive car”: A roadmap for research issues in the automotive sectorAnnual Reviews in Control, 2006
- The TerraMax autonomous vehicleJournal of Field Robotics, 2006
- Prediction of Human Driving Behavior Using Dynamic Bayesian NetworksIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 2006
- Automated vehicles for highway operations (automated highway systems)Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2005
- Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise controlIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2003
- A Unified Approach to Driver Assistance Systems Based on Artificial Potential FieldsJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1999
- Automated vehicle control developments in the PATH programIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 1991