Correlation of activity in neighbouring goldfish ganglion cells: relationship between latency and lag.
- 1 December 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 345 (1), 439-449
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014987
Abstract
Pairs of retinal ganglion cells in the isolated goldfish retina were recorded simultaneously with a single electrode. Repeated flashes of light were delivered to evaluate the response latency of each of the units. The cross-correlation histogram for the maintained discharge of each pair of cells was examined, and its temporal relationships (lags) were compared with the differences in response latencies of the 2 units. There was a strong correlation between these measures; the differences between latencies were often at least twice as great as the lags. The differences between the times to the peaks of the responses of the 2 units were less reliably related to the lags of the pairs, although the correlation was positive and the differences in time-to-peak generally greater than the lags. The weaker relationship between the difference in time-to-peak and lag than between latency difference and lag is apparently a manifestation of a negative correlation between latency and rise time (from first response to peak). Apparently, cells with a longer latency compensate with a faster rise time. There was a negative correlation between the mean maintained rate of a neuron and its response latency. Cells with faster maintained discharge rates respond sooner than those with slower maintained rates. There was virtually no relationship between the lags or the differences in latency and the differences between the magnitudes of the responses to light. Differences in latency (or lags) could be attributed to unequal effectiveness of the stimuli for the 2 units. The relationship between differences in latency and lags did not depend on the response categorizations of the units. It did not matter whether the members of the pairs were on center; off center or on-off center; neither did it matter whether they were X-like or not-X-like neurons. There may be marked pathways of differential conduction velocity through the retina.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Properties of rarely encountered types of ganglion cells in the cat's retina and on overall classificationThe Journal of Physiology, 1974
- Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1974
- Flux, not retinal illumination, is what cat retinal ganglion cells really care aboutThe Journal of Physiology, 1973
- Origin of the stochastic nature of ganglion cell activity in isolated goldfish retinaVision Research, 1973
- The effects of carbon dioxide on the excised goldfish retinaVision Research, 1972
- Spectral and spatial coding of ganglion cell responses in goldfish retina.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1972
- Quantitative aspects of gain and latency in the cat retinaThe Journal of Physiology, 1970
- Colour‐coded ganglion cells in the goldfish retina: extension of their receptive fields by means of new stimuliThe Journal of Physiology, 1968
- Maintained activity of cat retinal ganglion cells.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1967
- Neuronal Spike Trains and Stochastic Point ProcessesBiophysical Journal, 1967