Estimating Separately Personal Exposure to Ambient and Nonambient Particulate Matter for Epidemiology and Risk Assessment: Why and How
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Vol. 50 (7), 1167-1183
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464164
Abstract
This paper discusses the legal and scientific reasons for separating personal exposure to PM into ambient and nonambient components. It then demonstrates by several examples how well-established models and data typically obtained in exposure field studies can be used to estimate both individual and community average exposure to ambient-generated PM (ambient PM outdoors plus ambient PM that has infiltrated indoors), indoor-generated PM, and personal activity PM. Ambient concentrations are not highly correlated with personal exposure to nonambient PM or total PM but are highly correlated with personal exposure to ambient-generated PM. Therefore, ambient concentrations may be used in epidemiology as an appropriate surrogate for personal exposure to ambient-generated PM. Suggestions are offered as to how exposure to ambient-generated PM may be obtained and used in epidemiology and risk assessment.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review: Epidemiological Basis for Particulate Air Pollution Health StandardsAerosol Science and Technology, 2000
- Day-to-Day Particulate Exposures and Health Changes in Los Angeles Area Residents with Severe Lung DiseaseJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1999
- Fine Particles and Coarse Particles: Concentration Relationships Relevant to Epidemiologic StudiesJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1997
- Indoor Particles: A ReviewJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1996