Sociological Analysis and Education Management: the social context of the self‐managing school
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal of Sociology of Education
- Vol. 15 (1), 79-91
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569940150105
Abstract
In this paper I take issue with the claim of Ozga (1992) that because of the poor quality of many recent texts on education management, and their lack of a sociological perspective, they are not proper material for analysis in the British Journal of Sociology of Education. I argue that sociological analysis of such texts is an urgent priority because they have gained credibility among education practitioners and provide a spurious legitimacy to new right policy directions. This general argument is illustrated by focussing on four specific limitations of one of the most popular current texts on education management.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contextualizing Performances of Family FirmsFamily Business Review, 2011
- Masculinity and Women Teachers at Christian Brothers CollegeOrganization Studies, 1993
- ’Quality’ schooling, conservative education policy and educational change in AustraliaJournal of Education Policy, 1992
- Education ManagementBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1992
- The social context of democratic authority: A sympathetic response to Quantz, Cambron-McCabe and DantleyThe Urban Review, 1991
- Politics, Markets and America's SchoolsBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1991
- The ‘new right’ and educationBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1988
- Against the Current: Organizational Sociology and SocialismOrganization Studies, 1987
- School Reform: The District Policy Implications of the Effective Schools LiteratureThe Elementary School Journal, 1985
- Labor and Monopoly CapitalMonthly Review, 1974