The challenge of quantifying defect size and severity: Reality versus algorithm
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
- Vol. 6 (3), 362-371
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-3581(99)90049-1
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of defect size between thallium-201 and technetium-99m tetrofosmin myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with single-vessel coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Comparison between thallium-201 and technetium-99m methoxyisobutyl isonitrile defect size in single-photon emission computed tomography at rest, exercise and redistribution in coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Comparison of thallium-201 and technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile single-photon emission computed tomography for estimating the extent of myocardial ischemia and infarction in coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Determination of left ventricular mass using single-photon emission computed tomographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Quantitation of size of relative myocardial perfusion defect by single-photon emission computed tomography.Circulation, 1984
- 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction: comparison of planar imaging with single-photon tomography with and without blood pool overlay.Circulation, 1984
- The extraction of thallium-201 by the myocardium.Circulation, 1977
- Three dimensional geometry of acutely ischemic myocardium.Circulation, 1975
- Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic ShockCirculation, 1973
- Estimation of Infarct Size in Man and its Relation to PrognosisCirculation, 1972