Maximum likelihood estimation of reference centiles
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 9 (5), 539-548
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780090507
Abstract
We propose the use of centile estimates which are based on the fitting of appropriate densities by maximum likelihood. In the case of cross-sectional centile estimation, we show that this approach will generally lead to more precise estimates than would result from the use of non-parametric centile estimates. When longitudinal data are available or a series of cross-sectional data at different time points, the maximum likelihood approach can be used to simultaneously fit densities to each cross-section, subject to constraints (for example, smoothness constraints) on the parameters. The variances of these centile estimates are readily obtained and missing values and unequally spaced records are easily accommodated. We illustrate the procedure by means of an application using the Johnson family of densities to a study of weight gain in pregnancy.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fitting Smoothed Centile Curves to Reference DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1988
- Physical growth of infants 7 to 13 months of age: Results from a national surveyAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1987
- Prevalence of Obesity in Children After Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 1986
- Longitudinal growth standards for preschool childrenAnnals of Human Biology, 1983
- The Johnson System: Selection and Parameter EstimationTechnometrics, 1980
- A Probability Distribution and its Uses in Fitting DataTechnometrics, 1979
- Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the JackknifeThe Annals of Statistics, 1979
- On a General System of Distributions: I. Its Curve-Shape Characteristics; II. The Sample MedianJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1968
- A New Exposition and Chart for the Pearson System of Frequency CurvesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1936