Cultural Differences in Attitudes towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces
- 28 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Landscape Research
- Vol. 36 (5), 599-620
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.560474
Abstract
Understanding how different cultural and ethnic groups value and use urban parks is crucial in developing appropriate design and management strategies for urban greenspaces. However, little is known about how Turkish people respond to and use urban parks in their daily life. This study explores public attitudes towards urban parks in the Turkish cultural context through a questionnaire survey (n = 300) carried out in two popular urban parks of Isparta, Turkey. The results revealed some universal similarities to, as well as some distinct differences from, other cultures in attitudes towards urban parks. People in Turkey use urban parks generally for passive recreational activities such as picnicking, resting and relaxing, in contrast to Western countries where urban parks are generally used for walking, dog walking, sports activities and exercise. In contrast to a common concern about personal safety in urban parks, this study determined a positive perception of safety among Turkish people. Appreciation of natural features, experienced benefits, the need for recreational facilities and concerns for general cleanliness and maintenance were found as universally similar attitudes in urban parks.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferencesLandscape and Urban Planning, 2009
- Public preferences for visual quality and management in the Kackar Mountains National Park (Turkey)International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2006
- Environmental Problems and Visitor Behavior at the Olimpos National Park, TurkeyJournal of Applied Sciences, 2005
- The significance of parks to physical activity and public healthAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005
- The role of urban parks for the sustainable cityLandscape and Urban Planning, 2004
- Environmental and Policy Determinants of Physical Activity in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2001
- Visions of nature: conflict and compatibility in urban park restorationLandscape and Urban Planning, 2001
- Beyond toxicity11The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at www.elsevier.com/locate/ajpmonline.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2001
- Prospects of Köprülü Kanyon National Park for meeting both conservation targets and people's need for developmentLandscape and Urban Planning, 1993
- People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the CityUrban Studies, 1988