Health technology assessment in four countries: response from political science.
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 20 (1), 55-60
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462304000789
Abstract
Four studies, each on health technology assessment (HTA) in a different country, are presented in this volume. Conveying differing levels of sensitivity to political aspects of HTA, their storylines are similar in terms of the importance of the institutional structures that produce HTA and mediate its influence on health policy decision making. Regarding the internal politics of HTA, the latter appears to have developed in a relatively depoliticized environment, supported by a dense and varied web of institutional sites for funding, production, and consumption of HTA, buffered from the capricious impacts of electoral politics. Regarding external politics, HTA in all the countries began with relatively politically innocuous studies of technologies recognized to be of major import to national health systems or researcher-initiated studies. However, with increased focus in health systems on explicit determination of health benefits baskets, the role of HTA has become more high profile. This means that political accountability for the entire HTA process will increase. The implication is that future management of HTA programs will require self-conscious attention to the building of institutions capable of handling the delicate process of integrating science and politics in health policy.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health technology assessment in England and WalesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2004
- Overview of health technology assessment in FranceInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2004
- Technology assessment, priority setting, and appropriate care in Dutch health careInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2004
- Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in SwedenInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2004
- No cash to implement NICE, health authorities tell MPsBMJ, 2002
- Priority-setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative case studyThe Lancet, 2001
- Proof and Policy from Medical Research EvidenceJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2001
- Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level — the Israeli experienceHealth Policy, 2000
- The second phase of priority setting Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician's perspective on priority setting Israel's basic basket of health services: the importance of being explicitly implicitBMJ, 1998
- A modular approach to competitive refarm in health systemsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1992