Impact of Number of Nodes Retrieved on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 19 (1), 157-163
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.1.157
Abstract
PURPOSE: We postulated that the pathologic evaluation of the lymph nodes of surgical specimens from patients with rectal cancer can have a substantial impact on time to relapse and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 1,664 patients with T3, T4, or node-positive rectal cancer treated in a national intergroup trial of adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Associations between the number of lymph nodes found by the pathologist in the surgical specimen and the time to relapse and survival outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Patients were divided into groups by nodal status and the corresponding quartiles of numbers of nodes examined. The number of nodes examined was significantly associated with time to relapse and survival among patients who were node-negative. For the first through fourth quartiles, the 5-year relapse rates were 0.37, 0.34, 0.26, and 0.19 (P = .003), and the 5-year survival rates were 0.68, 0.73, 0.72, and 0.82 (P = .02). No significant differences were found by quartiles among patients determined to be node-positive. We propose that observed differences are primarily related to the incorrect determination of nodal status in node-negative patients. Approximately 14 nodes need to be studied to define nodal status accurately. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the pathologic assessment of lymph nodes in surgical specimens is often inaccurate and that examining greater number of nodes increases the likelihood of proper staging. Some patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy are misclassified as node-negative due to incomplete sampling of lymph nodes.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic factors in Stage T2NO rectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1999
- Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intentDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Rectal CancerArchives of Surgery, 1998
- Assessing the effectiveness of mesorectal excision in rectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Colorectal adenocarcinoma:Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1994
- Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearanceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1989
- Prognostic factors in rectal carcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1989
- LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA DUE TO INADEQUATE SURGICAL RESECTIONThe Lancet, 1986
- Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test ProceduresJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1972
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958