Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for sternal wound infection in high-risk patients following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial
- 1 September 2007
- Vol. 93 (9), 1126-1133
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.103002
Abstract
Objective: Prospective studies show a 10% incidence of sternal wound infection (SWI) after 90 days of follow-up, compared with infection rates of 5% reported by the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System after only 30 days of follow-up. This incidence increases 2–3 times in high-risk patients. Design: Prospective randomised double-blind controlled clinical trial. Setting: Cardiothoracic centre, UK. Patients: Patients were eligible if they were undergoing median sternotomy for primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, with at least one internal thoracic artery used for coronary grafting and having one or more of the following three risk factors: (1) obesity, defined as body mass index 30 kg/m2; (2) diabetes mellitus; or (3) bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts (ie, the use of the other internal thoracic artery). Interventions: The study group received a single dose of gentamicin 2 mg/kg, rifampicin 600 mg and vancomycin 15 mg/kg, with three further doses of 7.5 mg/kg at 12-hour intervals. The control group received cefuroxime 1.5 g at induction and three further doses of 750 mg at 8-hour intervals. Main outcome measures: The primary end point was the incidence of SWI at 90 days. The secondary end point was the antibiotic and hospital costs. Results: During the study period, 486 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with a 30-day SWI of 7.6%. 186 high-risk patients were recruited and analysed: 87 in the study group and 99 in the control group. 90-day SWI was significantly reduced in 8 patients in the study group (9.2%; 95% CI 3.5% to 15.3%) compared with 25 patients in the control group (25.2%; 95% CI 19.5% to 39.4%; p = 0.004). The study group had a significantly lower cost of antibiotics (21.2% reduction—US$96/patient; pConclusions: Longer and broader-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduces the incidence of SWI in high-risk patients, with a significant economic benefit in costs of antibiotics as well as hospital costs.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Surgery: An Advisory Statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention ProjectClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Sternal Surgical-Site Infection Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Prevalence, Microbiology, and Complications During a 42-Month PeriodInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2004
- Surgical-Site Infection Rates and Risk Factor Analysis in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2004
- Surgical-site infections within 60 days of coronary artery by-pass graft surgeryJournal of Hospital Infection, 2004
- Renal dysfunction after myocardial revascularizationEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Clinical, Microbiological, and Economic Benefit of a Change in Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cardiac SurgeryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2002
- Commissioned Analysis of Surgical Performance Using Routine Data: Lessons from the Bristol InquiryJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2002
- Does the Centers for Disease Control’s NNIS System Risk Index Stratify Patients Undergoing Cardiothoracic Operations by Their Risk of Surgical-Site Infection?Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2000
- Results of a Comprehensive Infection Control Program for Reducing Surgical-Site Infections in Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1999
- Comparison of Vancomycin and Cefuroxime for Infection Prophylaxis in Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1998