Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 82 (10), 1374-1377
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800821027
Abstract
Three hundred and ten patients having elective cholecystectomy were randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or mini‐cholecystectomy. There were 155 patients in each group. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was significantly more common with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 versus 4 per cent) and complications were significantly more frequent with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (9 versus 3 per cent). If laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successful, hospital stay was significantly shorter than for mini‐cholecystectomy (2 versus 3 days respectively), but overall the hospital stay was not significantly different. Postoperative analgesia requirements were reduced and return to normal activities and to work were faster after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There was no significant cost difference between the two procedures.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Gut, 1995
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.BMJ, 1992
- Laparoscopic or minilaparotomy cholecystectomy?BMJ, 1992
- Cholecystectomy and gallbladder conservationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- New trends in gallstone managementBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Conventional Versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The dundee techniqueBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Ambulatory Cholecystectomy Without DisabilityArchives of Surgery, 1990
- Cholecystectomy through a 5 cm subcostal incisionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990