Systematic evaluation of pembrolizumab dosing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
- 26 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 27 (7), 1291-1298
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw174
Abstract
In the phase I KEYNOTE-001 study, pembrolizumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to characterize the relationship between pembrolizumab dose, exposure, and response to define an effective dose for these patients. Patients received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) (n = 55), 10 mg/kg Q3W (n = 238), or 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 156). Response (RECIST v1.1) was assessed every 9 weeks. The relationship between the estimated pembrolizumab area under the concentration–time curve at steady state over 6 weeks (AUCss–6weeks) and the longitudinal change in tumor size (sum of longest diameters) was analyzed by regression and non-linear mixed effects modeling. This model was simultaneously fit to all tumor size data, then used to simulate response rates, normalizing the trial data across dose for prognostic covariates (tumor PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation status). The exposure–safety relationship was assessed by logistic regression of pembrolizumab AUCss–6weeks versus occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of interest based on their immune etiology. Overall response rates were 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7%–28%] at 2 mg/kg Q3W, 25% (18%–33%) at 10 mg/kg Q3W, and 21% (95% CI 14%–30%) at 10 mg/kg Q2W. Regression analyses of percentage change from baseline in tumor size versus AUCss–6weeks indicated a flat relationship (regression slope P > 0.05). Simulations showed the exposure–response relationship to be similarly flat, thus indicating that the lowest evaluated dose of 2 mg/kg Q3W to likely be at or near the efficacy plateau. Exposure–safety analysis showed the AE incidence to be similar among the clinically tested doses. No significant exposure dependency on efficacy or safety was identified for pembrolizumab across doses of 2–10 mg/kg. These results support the use of a 2 mg/kg Q3W dosage in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC. NCT01295827.Keywords
Funding Information
- Merck & Co., Inc.
- Merck & Co., Inc.
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase I Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475; Anti–PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody) in Patients with Advanced Solid TumorsClinical Cancer Research, 2015
- Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model of pembrolizumab (pembro; MK-3475) in patients (pts) treated in KEYNOTE-001 and KEYNOTE-002.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2015
- Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trialThe Lancet, 2014
- A Review of Mixed‐Effects Models of Tumor Growth and Effects of Anticancer Drug Treatment Used in Population AnalysisCPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 2014
- Exploratory Modeling and Simulation to Support Development of Motesanib in Asian Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on MONET1 Study ResultsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2014
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Monoclonal AntibodiesClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2010
- Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors: Immune-Related Response CriteriaClinical Cancer Research, 2009
- Elucidation of Relationship Between Tumor Size and Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Can Aid Early Decision Making in Clinical Drug DevelopmentClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2009
- New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)European Journal Of Cancer, 2009