Cutback Contradictions in Dutch Housing Policy
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Social Policy
- Vol. 15 (2), 223-236
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279400001689
Abstract
This paper describes housing policy in the Netherlands and the current crisis over subsidies. It argues that the development of the welfare state, the housing system, and recent retrenchment contain contradictions which reflect the distinctive nature of Dutch politics and social structure. In particular, it suggests that the existence of pillarized social cleavages has been influential in the growth of a progressive welfare state, in providing a secure base for social rented housing, and in sustaining high levels of support for spending on housing subsidies. Expenditure cutbacks and measures for administrative rationalization are outlined, and some of the contradictory effects on housing policy are examined.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative urban analysis and assumptions about causalityInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1986
- The Restructuring of Housing Provision in Britain and the NetherlandsEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1985
- DemocraciesPublished by JSTOR ,1984
- Comparative Housing ResearchJournal of Social Policy, 1984
- Toward a Political Economy of Consociationalism: A Commentary on Marxist Views of Pillarization in the NetherlandsComparative Politics, 1984
- Intervention in the NetherlandsUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1984
- The squatter movement in AmsterdamInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1983
- Changing Relationships in Dutch Social ServicesJournal of Social Policy, 1982
- Tanks in the streetsInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1981
- Depillarisation in the NetherlandsBritish Journal of Sociology, 1981