Just how valuable is double reporting in screening mammography?
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 52 (6), 466-468
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80010-4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammogramsBMJ, 1996
- Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experienceThe British Journal of Radiology, 1995
- Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of MammogramsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program.Radiology, 1994
- The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screeningClinical Radiology, 1994
- Double reading of mammography screening films-one radiologist or two?Clinical Radiology, 1993
- Team learning and breast cancer screeningThe Lancet, 1991
- REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHYThe Lancet, 1985
- REDUCTION OF BREAST CANCER MORTALITY THROUGH MASS SCREENING WITH MODERN MAMMOGRAPHYThe Lancet, 1984