Sovereignty
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Comparative Political Studies
- Vol. 21 (1), 66-94
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414088021001004
Abstract
Contemporary social science analysis is dominated by utilitarian or functional approaches in which institutional structures are assumed to adapt in an optimal fashion to changing environmental conditions, and the preferences and capabilities of individual actors are ontologically posited. In contrast, an institutional perspective insists that past choices constrain present options; that the preferences and capabilities of individual actors are conditioned by institutional structures; and that historical trajectories are path dependent. Institutional structures persist even if circumstances change. In a world of nuclear weapons and economic interdependence, any adequate analysis of the nature of sovereignty operationalized with regard to transborder controls and extraterritoriality must be informed by an institutional perspective.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The agent-structure problem in international relations theoryInternational Organization, 1987
- Editors' Comments: Perspectives from Economics and PsychologyThe Journal of Business, 1986
- Kondratieff Waves as War CyclesInternational Studies Quarterly, 1985
- Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of EmbeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1985
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Darwinism and the Expansion of Evolutionary TheoryScience, 1982
- Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to RayburnAmerican Political Science Review, 1981
- The Population Ecology of OrganizationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- State-building, state boundaries and border controlSocial Science Information, 1974
- The economics of interdependenceThe International Executive, 1968