Event‐related potential (ERP) indices of infants’ recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects in two and three dimensions
- 16 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Science
- Vol. 9 (1), 51-62
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00463.x
Abstract
We measured infants’ recognition of familiar and unfamiliar 3‐D objects and their 2‐D representations using event‐related potentials (ERPs). Infants differentiated familiar from unfamiliar objects when viewing them in both two and three dimensions. However, differentiation between the familiar and novel objects occurred more quickly when infants viewed the object in 3‐D than when they viewed 2‐D representations. The results are discussed with respect to infants’ recognition abilities and their understanding of real objects and representations. This is the first study using 3‐D objects in conjunction with ERPs in infants, and it introduces an interesting new methodology for assessing infants’ electrophysiological responses to real objects.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Infants' Manual Exploration of Pictorial Objects Varying in RealismInfancy, 2003
- Emergence of sensitivity to pictorial depth cues: Charting development in individual infantsInfant Behavior and Development, 2002
- Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants.Developmental Psychology, 1999
- Neural correlates of cross-modal recognition memory by 8-month-old human infants.Developmental Psychology, 1993
- Event-related potential and looking-time analysis of infants' responses to familiar and novel events: Implications for visual recognition memory.Developmental Psychology, 1991
- Imitation of Televised Models by InfantsChild Development, 1988
- Infants' Cross-Modal Transfer from Solid Objects to Their Graphic RepresentationsChild Development, 1983
- Intermodal matching by human neonatesNature, 1979
- Picture perception in infancyInfant Behavior and Development, 1979
- Infants' Transfer of Response between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional StimuliChild Development, 1977