Assisted Reproductive Technology and Pregnancy Outcome
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 106 (5, Part 1), 1039-1045
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000183593.24583.7c
Abstract
To determine whether the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with an increase in chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformations, or adverse pregnancy outcomes. A prospective database from a large multicenter investigation of singleton pregnancies, the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk trial, was examined. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: no ART use, use of ovulation induction (with or without intrauterine insemination), and use of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess association between ART and adverse pregnancy outcomes (significance of differences was accepted at P < .05). A total of 36,062 pregnancies were analyzed: 34,286 (95.1%) were spontaneously conceived, 1,222 (3.4%) used ovulation induction, and 554 (1.5%) used IVF. There was no association between ART and fetal growth restriction, aneuploidy, or fetal anomalies after adjustment for age, race, marital status, years of education, prior preterm delivery, prior fetal anomaly, body mass index, smoking history, and bleeding in the current pregnancy. Ovulation induction was associated with a statistically significant increase in placental abruption, fetal loss after 24 weeks, and gestational diabetes after adjustment. Use of IVF was associated with a statistically significant increase in preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, placental abruption, placenta previa, and risk of cesarean delivery. Patients who undergo IVF are at increased risk for several adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although many of these risks are not seen in patients undergoing ovulation induction, several adverse pregnancy outcomes are still increased in this group. There was no increased incidence of fetal chromosomal or structural abnormalities in the women who used any type of ART compared with the women who conceived spontaneously. II-2.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Children Born After Assisted Reproductive Technology at Increased Risk for Adverse Health Outcomes?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Perinatal Outcomes in Singletons Following In Vitro Fertilization: A Meta-AnalysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection safe?Fertility and Sterility, 2003
- Short Communication: The Incidence of Major Birth Defects Following In Vitro FertilizationJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2003
- The Risk of Major Birth Defects after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and in Vitro FertilizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Low and Very Low Birth Weight in Infants Conceived with Use of Assisted Reproductive TechnologyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based studyThe Lancet, 2002
- Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive techniques: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulationHuman Reproduction, 2001
- Clinical Assisted Reproduction: Are Singleton Assisted Reproductive Technology Pregnancies at Risk of Prematurity?Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2001
- Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysisThe Lancet, 1999