Challenges in optimal metabolic control of diabetes
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Wiley in Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
- Vol. 18 (S3), S36-S41
- https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.286
Abstract
The results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed that tight glycemic control with any of several therapeutic regiments has the potential to significantly reduce the risks for long‐term microvascular complications of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The results of these large‐scale long‐term studies also demonstrated that there is no threshold for the relationship between blood glucose [i.e. glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)] and reduced risk. This means that ‘optimal’ glycemic control in a patient with type 1 or type 2 diabetes is a blood glucose level as close as possible to the level in an individual without diabetes. Limitations of most available therapies for type 1 and 2 diabetes have hampered achievement of this goal. Most available insulin prepartions used to treat patients with type 1 disease can achieve approximately normal basal insulin levels only when used with a pump or a complex treatment regimen requiring a large number of daily injections. Pumps are limited by high expense, and complex injection protocols increase the potential for patient errors and non‐compliance. The development of new insulins such as aspart insulin and lispro insulin, both short‐acting, and insulin glargine, a long‐acting insulin analogue suitable for once‐daily administration, may help overcome these challenges. In patients with type 2 diabetes, achieving optimal glycemic control is complicated by the progressive nature of the disease and the loss of efficacy of oral agents (e.g. sulfonylureas, metformin, and thiazolidinediones) over time. Moreover, neither oral therapy nor insulin alone is likely to achieve optimal glycemic control in most of these patients in the long term. The availability of new insulin preparations that mimic the normal mealtime bursts of insulin, and another that provides a sustained insulin supply similar to basal insulin secretion in an individual without diabetes has the potential to significantly improve long‐term control over blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kosten des Typ-2-Diabetes in DeutschlandDeutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2001
- Controlling glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetesBMJ, 2000
- Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational studyBMJ, 2000
- Insulin analogues and their potential in the management of diabetes mellitusDiabetologia, 1999
- Pharmacologic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Long-term intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes with the short-acting insulin analog lispro in variable combination with NPH insulin at mealtime.Diabetes Care, 1999
- Current status and future prospects of parenteral insulin regimens, strategies and delivery systems for diabetes treatmentAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1999
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- INTENSIVE TREATMENT OF TYPE 1 DIABETESMedical Clinics of North America, 1998
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993