Financial interests of patient organisations contributing to technology assessment at England’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: policy review
Open Access
- 16 January 2019
- Vol. 364, k5300
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5300
Abstract
Objective To investigate the prevalence of financial interests among patient organisations contributing to health technology assessment at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England and the extent to which NICE’s disclosure policy ensures that decision making committees are aware of these interests. Design Policy review using accounts, annual reports, and websites of patient organisations; payments declared by pharmaceutical manufacturers on their websites and a centralised database (Disclosure UK); declarations of interests by nominated representatives of patient organisations; and responses from patient organisations. Setting Appraisals of medicines and treatments (technologies) for use in the English and Welsh National Health Service. Participants 53 patient organisations contributing to 41 NICE technology appraisals published in 2015 and 2016, with 117 separate occasions that a patient organisation contributed to the appraisal of a technology. Main outcome measures Prevalence of specific interests (that is, funding from manufacturer(s) of a technology under appraisal or competitor products); proportion of specific interests of which NICE’s decision making committees were aware; proportion of unknown specific interests for which disclosure was not required by NICE’s policy Results 38/53 (72%) patient organisations had accepted funding from the manufacturer(s) of a technology or a competitor product in the same year that they had contributed to the appraisal of that technology or the previous year. Specific interests were present on 92/117 (79%) occasions that patient organisations contributed to appraisals in 2015 and 2016. NICE’s decision making committees were aware of less than a quarter of specific interests (30/144; 21%). For nearly two thirds of the specific interests not known to committees (71/114; 62%), disclosure by patient organisations was not required by NICE’s policy. Conclusions Financial interests are highly prevalent among patient organisations contributing to health technology assessment. NICE should review its disclosure policy to ensure that decision making committees are aware of all relevant interests.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Engagement in Health Technology Assessment and Coverage Decisions: A Study of Experiences in France, Germany, and the United KingdomJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2013
- An International Survey of the Public Engagement Practices of Health Technology Assessment OrganizationsValue in Health, 2013
- INVOLVEMENT OF CONSUMERS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES BY INAHTA AGENCIESInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2012
- Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisionsExpert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2011
- Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiencesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011
- Moving cautiously: Public involvement and the health technology assessment communityInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011
- Making Sense of Non-Financial Competing InterestsPLoS Medicine, 2008
- In whose interest? Relationships between health consumer groups and the pharmaceutical industry in the UKSociology of Health & Illness, 2008
- Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practiceHealth Policy, 2006
- Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2006