Availability and Social Projection
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 15 (1), 84-90
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289151008
Abstract
Two studies are reported that examined the effects of sequence of measurement and wording of the estimation question on estimates of consensus. In both studies estimates of consensus for own choice, and hence the magnitude of false consensus effects, were larger when estimates were generated before making the choice and when individuals estimated consensus for their own choices. It is suggested that sequence of measurement and the wording of the estimation question influence the cognitive availability of the choices used in social projection research. These findings confirm at the level of primary research some subtle determinants of the magnitude of social projection effects that werefirst identified using meta-analytic techniques.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta‐analytic integrationsBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1988
- Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis testsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1985
- Egocentric Bias in Estimates of ConsensusThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1983
- Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: Differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positionsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1983
- The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977
- Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 1973