Synthesising licensing data to assess drug safety
- 26 February 2004
- Vol. 328 (7438), 518-520
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7438.518
Abstract
Small randomised trials conducted for licensing purposes should record data on adverse results and be made public The safety of drugs is important. For full information we need to assess not only the immediate effects but also unexpected longer term effects on serious disease like coronary heart disease or cancer, especially for drugs that will be widely used. Reliably assessing the safety of drugs, however, is fraught with problems such as rare events, long follow up, strong vested interests, and biased reporting. The example of hormone replacement therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease shows some of the problems and presents useful lessons. Observational studies and trials on intermediate cardiovascular variables indicated that oestrogen and progesterone supplements might protect menopausal women from cardiovascular disease as well as menopausal symptoms. The evidence was convincing. For example, the nurses' study of 120 000 women followed for 30 years estimated the adjusted relative risk for coronary heart disease at 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.32 0.69) for women currently taking hormone replacement therapy compared with never users.1 This was a common finding in observational studies and understandably led to the strong belief that hormone replacement therapy would be protective. Since the drugs also benefited lipid profiles,2 the argument seemed invincible. If the results were correct, the risk:benefit ratio of hormone replacement therapy was unambiguously positive.3 Hormone replacement therapy would be beneficial even for asymptomatic women, notwithstanding possible detrimental effects such as an increased risk of breast cancer. These data affected marketing and prescribing; prevention of coronary heart disease became an added indication among symptomatic women, although the licensed indications were for menopausal symptoms and the prevention of osteoporosis. ![][1] Hormone replacement patch: better use should have been made of existing evidence on the risks of HRT Credit: AJ PHOTO/SPL The enthusiasm, however, was … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gifKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estrogen plus Progestin and the Risk of Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Balancing benefits and harms in health careBMJ, 2003
- Postmenopausal Hormone TherapyCirculation, 2003
- Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2002
- Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and MortalityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Hormone replacement therapy in a risk-benefit perspectiveMaturitas, 1996
- Selection to postmenopausal therapy by women's characteristicsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Menopause and Risk Factors for Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Influence of Adherence to Treatment and Response of Cholesterol on Mortality in the Coronary Drug ProjectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- The case for recording events in clinical trials.BMJ, 1977