Bone marrow transplantation with unrelated donors: what is the probability of identifying an HLA-A/B/Cw/DRB1/B3/B5/DQB1-matched donor?
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Vol. 26 (4), 437-441
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702529
Abstract
Patients transplanted with marrow from an HLA-ABDR serologically matched unrelated donor suffer from more post-transplant complications than those who are transplanted with marrow from an HLA-identical sibling. This is most likely due to either HLA-ABDR incompatibilities not resolved by standard techniques and/or HLA polymorphisms not tested for by routine tissue typing (HLA-Cw,-DQ). By resolving these incompatibilities by molecular techniques combined with the in vitro cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor frequency (CTLpf) test, we have shown that a high degree of HLA compatibility is associated with increased patient survival. However, higher requirements for HLA matching decrease the number of available donors. We have estimated the probability of finding an HLA-A/B/Cw/DRB1/DRB3/DRB5/DQB1 compatible donor based on 104 consecutive unrelated bone marrow donor searches initiated between January 1995 and December 1997, with December 1998 as the endpoint. For 96 patients (92.3%), one or more ABDR-identical donors were listed in the Bone Marrow Donor Worldwide Registry (BMDW). After contacting the registries, we obtained at least one (mean, 5.36; range, 1-20; total, 461) blood sample for 86 patients. A highly compatible donor was identified for 33/86 patients (38.4%), after testing an average number of 4.5 donors/patients (range, 1-13). However, by accepting an HLA-DRB3 or -DQB1 or -Cw incompatibility, this number would be as high as 68.6%. Approximately half of the patients (n = 40) for whom a search had been initiated have been transplanted: 22 patients with a perfectly matched donor, 15 patients with an HLA-DRB3 or -DQB1 or -Cw mismatch and three with other mismatches. The average time needed to identify the most compatible donor was 4 months. Extremely long searches seemed to be less useful, because after testing the first seven, a more compatible donor was seldom found. These results show that even when requirements for compatibility are high, the chances of finding a donor remain considerably low.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blood and marrow transplantation activity in Europe 1997Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1999
- Histocompatibility testing guidelines for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using volunteer donors: report from The World Marrow Donor AssociationBone Marrow Transplantation, 1999
- Effect of Matching of Class I HLA Alleles on Clinical Outcome after Transplantation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells from an Unrelated DonorNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Problems and possible solutions in finding an unrelated bone marrow donor. Results of consecutive searches for 240 Dutch patientsBone Marrow Transplantation, 1997
- German consensus on immunogenetic donor search for transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cellsBone Marrow Transplantation, 1997
- Molecular characterization of HLA‐C incompatibilities in HLA‐ABDR‐matched unrelated bone marrow donor‐recipient pairsTissue Antigens, 1997
- HLA matching in unrelated donor bone marrow transplantationCurrent Opinion in Hematology, 1996
- MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FROM UNRELATED VOLUNTEER DONORSAnnual Review of Medicine, 1995
- Replacement of HLA class II serology by the HLA‐DR microtitre plate oligotyping assay: a one‐year experience in unrelated bone marrow donor selectionBritish Journal of Haematology, 1993
- Selection of unrelated donors for bone marrow transplantation is improved by HLA class II genotyping with oligonucleotide hybridization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1991