Prevention and Correction Mechanisms behind Anaphase Synchrony: Implications for the Genesis of Aneuploidy
- 31 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Cytogenetic and Genome Research
- Vol. 133 (2-4), 243-253
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000323803
Abstract
The perpetuation of the species' genomic identity strongly depends on the accurate maintenance of chromosome number through countless cell generations. The synchronous entry and progression of all chromosomes through anaphase is fundamental for the quality of mitosis and is guaranteed by error prevention and correction mechanisms that ultimately certify the bipolar attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic spindle, the uniform distribution of forces amongst different chromosomes, and the simultaneity of sister-chromatid separation. The existence of a kinetochore-attachment checkpoint (KAC; also known as spindle-assembly checkpoint) ensures a delay in anaphase onset if any kinetochore remains unattached or devoid of a proper complement of microtubules. The stochastic nature of micro tubule-kinetochore interactions predisposes the mitotic process to mistakes, but different molecular players cooperate by detecting and releasing incorrect attachments and thus delaying checkpoint satisfaction. Conversely, correct microtubule-kinetochore interactions become selectively stabilized. Once anaphase onset is triggered, the segregation velocities achieved by each chromosome should be similar, so that none of the chromosomes is lagged behind. This reflects the uniformity of forces acting on the different chromosomes and relies on a conspicuous mitotic spindle property known as microtubule poleward flux. Importantly, not all incorrect attachments are detected and resolved prior to anaphase leading to asynchronous chromosome segregation, but several mechanisms are in place to prevent aneuploidy. One of these mechanisms relies on anaphase spindle forces and another, known as the NoCut checkpoint, delays cell cleavage during cytokinesis until chromosomes can free the spindle mid-region. In this review we discuss how these different mechanisms act in concert to ensure the fidelity of the mitotic process. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, BaselKeywords
This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Protein Composition of Mitotic Chromosomes Determined Using Multiclassifier Combinatorial ProteomicsCell, 2010
- Sister chromatid tension and the spindle assembly checkpointCurrent Opinion in Cell Biology, 2009
- Deviant Kinetochore Microtubule Dynamics Underlie Chromosomal InstabilityCurrent Biology, 2009
- Motor-Independent Targeting of CLASPs to Kinetochores by CENP-E Promotes Microtubule Turnover and Poleward FluxCurrent Biology, 2009
- Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1Current Biology, 2008
- Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment Relies on the Disordered N-Terminal Tail Domain of Hec1Current Biology, 2008
- The ability to survive mitosis in the presence of microtubule poisons differs significantly between human nontransformed (RPE‐1) and cancer (U2OS, HeLa) cellsCell Motility, 2008
- Kinetochore Microtubule Dynamics and Attachment Stability Are Regulated by Hec1Cell, 2006
- The Conserved KMN Network Constitutes the Core Microtubule-Binding Site of the KinetochoreCell, 2006
- Efficient Mitosis in Human Cells Lacking Poleward Microtubule FluxCurrent Biology, 2005