Harassment Based on Sex: Protecting Social Status in the Context of Gender Hierarchy
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 32 (2), 641-658
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351879
Abstract
I conceptualize sex-based harassment as behavior that derogates an individual based on sex. I propose that sex-based harassment is fundamentally motivated by the harasser's desire to protect or enhance his or her own sex-based status, a desire that stems from the fact that social status is stratified by a system of gender hierarchy. This theory explains currently identified forms of sexual harassment and predicts others, including nonsexual harassment between women.This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- The emergence of homegrown stereotypes.American Psychologist, 2002
- Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1999
- Structural equation models of sexual harassment: Longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999
- The Impact of Male Work Environments and Organizational Policies on Women's Experiences of Sexual HarassmentGender & Society, 1998
- Ambient Sexual Harassment: An Integrated Model of Antecedents and ConsequencesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997
- Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizationsEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1996
- The content and development of mobbing at workEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1996
- SEXUAL HARASSMENT RESEARCH: A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUEPersonnel Psychology, 1995