Regression Coefficient Identification Decay in The Presence of Infrequent Classification Errors
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Vol. 92 (4), 1017-1023
- https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00044
Abstract
Recent evidence from Bound, Brown, and Mathiowetz (2001) and Black, Sanders, and Taylor (2003) suggests that reporting errors in survey data routinely violate all of the classical measurement error assumptions. The econometrics literature has not considered the consequences of fully arbitrary measurement error for identification of regression coefficients. This paper highlights the severity of the identification problem given the presence of even infrequent arbitrary errors in a binary regressor. In the empirical component, health insurance misclassification rates of less than 1.3% generate double-digit percentage point ranges of uncertainty about the variable's true marginal effect on the use of health services. (c) 2010 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of Higher Education in the Census and Current Population SurveyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2003
- Bounding Parameter Estimates with Nonclassical Measurement ErrorJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000
- Bounding mean regressions when a binary regressor is mismeasuredJournal of Econometrics, 1996
- Instrumental variable estimator for the nonlinear errors-in-variables modelJournal of Econometrics, 1985
- Regression with a binary independent variable subject to errors of observationJournal of Econometrics, 1973